Interpretación del paradigma «Student Engagement» en España (una revisión bibliométrica)

Elena Catalán Martínez; Gloria Aparicio de Castro

doi:10.51302/tce.2017.114

Autores/as

Elena Catalán Martínez Assistant Professor of the Department of History and Economic Institutions, University of the Basque Country (España)
Gloria Aparicio de Castro Professor of the Department of Financial Economy II (Economy of the Company and Commercialization), University of the Basque Country (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2017.114

Palabras clave:

compromiso del estudiante, sistema universitario español, revisión bibliométrica

Resumen

En este trabajo pretendemos valorar el impacto y la interpretación que se ha hecho del concepto «Student Engagement» en el sistema universitario español. Para ello, hemos creído oportuno revisar las aportaciones realizadas en los últimos cinco años en los principales congresos internacionales en innovación docente universitaria celebrados en España y las publicaciones de ámbito nacional que sobre este tema aparecen registradas en las bases de datos de Scopus y Web of Science. Con ello, delimitaremos no solo el impacto del Student Engagement entre los docentes nacionales e internacionales que participan en estos foros, sino también la interpretación que hacen de dicho concepto.

La revisión de documentos y nuestra propia posición como docentes nos hace reflexionar sobre una propuesta que pueda guiar futuras líneas de investigación en el tema. En este sentido, consideramos que la gestión de la universidad, especialmente en el sistema español, aún no se realiza teniendo en cuenta una visión holística de la experiencia del estudiante universitario. Para desarrollar plenamente las tres dimensiones de actuación sobre el Student Engagement será necesario un enfoque multidisciplinar que considere tanto las aportaciones más puras del management, del university experiential marketing, como las de las educational sciences con sus conocimientos en metodologías docentes.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Aparicio, G.; Ruiz-Roqueñi, M. and Catalán, E. [2014a]: «Desarrollo e implantación de un sistema de coordinación en los centros universitarios: el caso de la Facultad de CC. EE. y Empresariales (UPV-EHU)», in J. L. Coca (coord.), Retos actuales, la conquista de los nuevos mercados, Madrid: ESIC, pp. 1.255-1.272.

[2014b]: «A model for implementing non-specific competencies (NSCs) in degree studies, defined using a Delphi study in Spanish universities», in M. Peris-Ortiz and J. M.ª Merigó (eds.), Sustainable learning in higher education: developing competences for the global marketplace, London: Springer, chap. 4, pp. 47-61.

Aparicio, G.; Forcada, J.; Lafuente, A. and Zorrilla; P. [2015]: «Management challenges in higher education: new proposals from experiential marketing literature review», INTED 2015: 9th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Madrid.

Astin, A. W. [1984]: «Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher education», Journal of College Student Development, 25, pp. 297-308.

Barnett, B. E. and Whitford, E. V. [2013]: «Developing a four-year model of student engagement: collaboration between academic and student affairs to promote student success», Proceedings of EDULEARN 2013, Barcelona (Spain), pp. 1.512-1.517.

Clemes, M.; Gan, C. and Kao, T.-H. [2008]: «University student satisfaction: an empirical analysis», Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 8 (3), pp. 1-14.

Coates, H. [2007]: «A model of on line and general campus-based student engagement», Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (2), pp. 121-141.

[2010]: «Development of the Australian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE)», Higher Education, 60 (1), pp. 121-141.

Elsharnouby, T. H. [2015]: «Student co-creation behavior in higher education: the role of satisfaction with the university experience», Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 25 (2), pp. 238-262.

Flecha, R. and Puigvert, L. [2002]: «Las comunidades de aprendizaje: una apuesta por la igualdad educativa», Rexe: Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 1, pp. 11-20.

Fredricks, J. A.; Blumenfeld, P.; Friedel, J. and Paris, A. H. [2005]: «School engagement», in K. A. Moore and L. H. Lippman (eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizating and measuring indicators of positive development, New York: Springer, pp. 305-321.

García-Estévez, J. and Duch-Brown, N. [2014]: «Student graduation in Spain: to what extent does university expenditure matter?», Springer: Research in Higher Education, 55, pp. 308-328. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9312-9

HEFCE [2008]: Tender for a study into student engagement, Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.

Hemsley-Brown, J. and Oplatka, I. [2014]: «Universities in a competitive global marketplace: a systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing», International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19 (4), pp. 316-338.

Hu, S. and Kuh, G. D. [10-14 April 2001]: «Being (dis) engaged in educationally purposeful activities. The influences of student and institutional characteristics», paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Seattle (WA).

Johnson, M. K. and Dean, M. [2001]: «Student engagement and International Baccalaureate: measuring the social, emotional and academic engagement of IB students», paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans (LA).

Johnson, D. W.; Johnson, R. T. and Smith, K. A. [July- August 1998]: «Cooperative learning returns to college: what evidence is there that it works?», Change, pp. 27-35.

Johnson, D. W.; Johnson, R. T. and Stanne, M. B. [2000]: Cooperative learning methods: a meta-analysis. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Johnson50/publication/220040324_Cooperative_Learning_Methods_A_Meta-Analysis/links/00b4952b39d258145c000000.pdf [Search: April 2016].

Kahu, E. R. [2013]: «Framing student engagement in Higher Education», Studies in Higher Education, 38 (5), pp. 758-773.

Kember, D. [1997]: «A reconceptualisation of the research into the university academics´ conceptions of teaching», Learning and Instruction, 7 (3), pp. 255-275.

Kember, D. and Hong, C. [2008]: «The importance of stablishing relevance in motivating student learning», Active Learning in Higher Education, 9 (3), pp. 249-263.

Keyser, M. W. [2000]: «Active learning and cooperative learning: understanding the difference and using both styles effectively», Research Strategies, 17, pp. 35-44.

Krause, K. and Coates, H. [2008]: «Student´s engagement in first-year university», Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (5), pp. 493-505.

Kuh, G. D. [2001]: «The national survey of student engagement: conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties», Framework & Psychometric Properties, Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planing. Retrieved from: http://nsse.indiana.edu/pdf/conceptual_framework_2003.pdf [Search: January 2016].

[2003]: The national survey of student engagement: conceptual framework and overview of psicometric properties, Bloomington (IN): Center for Postsecondary Research.

[2009]: «What student affairs professional need to know about student engagement», Journal of College Student Development, 50 (6), pp. 683-706.

Kuh, G. D.; Kinzie, J.; Buckley, J. A.; Bridges, B. K. and Haiek, J. C. [2007]: «Piecing together the student success puzzle: research propositions, and recommendations», ASHE Higher Education Report, 32 (5), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

McCrindle, M. [2014]: The ABC of XYZ. Understanding the global generations, McCrindle Research. Retrieved from: http://mccrindle.com.au/resources/The-ABC-of-XYZ_Chapter-1.pdf [Search: June 2016].

Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte [2015]: Datos y cifras del Sistema Universitario Español. Curso 2014-15. Retrieved from: http://www.mecd.gob.es/dms/mecd/educacion-mecd/areas-educacion/universidades/estadisticas-informes/datos-cifras/Datos-y-Cifras-del-SUE-Curso-2014-2015.pdf [Search: June 2016].

Parahoo, S.; Harvey, H. and Tamim, R. [2013]: «Factors influencing student satisfaction in universities in the gulf region: does gender of students matter?», Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 23 (2), pp. 135-154.

Ramsden, P. [1992]: Learning to teach in higher education, London and New York: Rotledge, pp. 40-46.

Romero, A; Pascual, M. and Fernández, M. [2015]: «Research comparing university Teaching withing the EHEA between the University CEU Cardenal Herrera in Spain and the University of Bedfordshire in England», Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, pp. 250-261.

Salanova, M. and Schaufeli, W. [2009]: «¿Qué es el engagement en el trabajo? Concepto y medida», in M. Salanova and W. Schaufeli, El engagement en el trabajo: cuando el trabajo se convierte en pasión, Madrid: Alianza Editorial, Madrid, cap. 3, pp. 93-125.

Trowler, V. and Trowler, P. [2010]: Student engagement evidence summary, York (UK): Higher Education Academy.

Vallés Acosta, Y. [2014]: «Generaciones hoy. De baby boomers a millennials, la necesaria evolución de las estructuras sociales», Revista del Tecnológico de Monterrey, 9.

Yazzie-Mintz, E. and McCormick, K. [2013]: «Finding the humanity in the data: understanding, measuring, and strengthening student engagement», in S. Christenson; A. L. Reschly and C. Wylie (eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement, London: Springer, pp. 743-761.