Use of preliminary surveys in the educational platform for the creation of student profiles in the first weeks of teaching

Authors

  • Gemma Minero Alejandre Profesora ayudante doctora de Derecho Civil de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2019.337

Keywords:

higher education, education quality, information and communication technologies (ICT), survey, continuous assessment

Abstract

Sometimes factors such as the –limited− number of hours of lecture in the current educa­tional environment drive the faculty members to improvisation when re-organizing schedule and materials. This study suggests the use of an initial survey in each group. The key point when implementing this proposal implies giving the students access to the survey before the lectures start and giving enough time. The questions contained within the survey must be based in –and only in− the educational aims of the course. Finally, it is important to take into account that there must be a real interest in the educator in knowing or following the evolution of the students in relation to the questions contained within the initial survey. Therefore, the results of the initial survey should be reflected both in the schedule and materials of the course. This strategy may increase the faculty’s level of confidence when creating and adapting the schedule and choosing the educative methodologies to be applied. Finally, initial surveys can contribute to build the students’ conscience of the effort made by the faculty in knowing individuals and groups. In the future, it may be a good opportunity for students enrolling an active role in their learning process. Besides, surveys may be useful in education assessments processes, such as Docentia programme.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación. (2015). Programa Docentia. Programa de apoyo para la evaluación de la actividad docente del profesorado universitario. Integración y actualización de la documentación del programa 2015. V1. Recuperado de http://www.aneca.es/Programas-de-evaluacion/Evaluacion-institucional/DOCENTIA/Documentacion-delprograma (consultado en junio de 2019).

Castro López-Tarruella, E. (2004). Moodle: manual del profesor. Recuperado de https://moodle.org/file.php/11/manual_del_profesor/Manual-profesor.pdf (consultado en junio de 2019).

Cazurro Barahona, V. (2017). Las universidades públicas y el coste de la garantía del derecho a la protección de datos personales. Actualidad Administrativa, 4.

García Jiménez, E. y Rodríguez Conde, M.ª J. (2018). El programa Docentia: fundamentos, desarrollo e implicaciones. Revista de Educación y Derecho, 17, 1-26.

Iglesias Rodríguez, A., Olmos Migueláñez, S., Torrecilla Sánchez, E. M.ª y Mena Marco, J. J. (2014). Evaluar para optimizar el uso de la plataforma Moodle (studium) en el departamento de didáctica, organización y métodos de investigación. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 23, 155-170.

Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 253-388.

Pablo González, G. de. (2017). Factores que favorecen la presencia docente en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 29, 43-58.

Rodríguez Conde, M.ª J. (1994). El autoinforme en la evaluación docente del profesorado universitario (Tesis). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.

Rodríguez Espinar, S. (2013). Panorama internacional de la evaluación de la calidad en la educación superior. Madrid: Síntesis.

Published

2019-09-05

How to Cite

Minero Alejandre, G. (2019). Use of preliminary surveys in the educational platform for the creation of student profiles in the first weeks of teaching. Technology, Science and Education Journal, (14), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2019.337