La producción de objetos de aprendizaje en realidad aumentada por los estudiantes. Los estudiantes como prosumidores de información

Julio Cabero Almenara; Julio Barroso Osuna; Óscar Gallego Pérez

doi:10.51302/tce.2018.221

Authors

Julio Cabero Almenara Catedrático de Didáctica y Organización Escolar de la Universidad de Sevilla (España)
Julio Barroso Osuna Profesor titular de la Universidad de Sevilla (España)
Óscar Gallego Pérez Miembro del Grupo de Investigación Didáctica de la Universidad de Sevilla (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2018.221

Keywords:

augmented reality (AR), educational innovation, production of learning objects in AR, technology acceptance model (TAM), instructional material motivational survey (IMMS)

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) is one of the emerging technologies with great educational possibilities that is being incorporated into different disciplines and at different educational levels, since it combines, in real time and with the participation of the user, digital information with physical information through different technological supports, such as smartphones or tablets, to create a new reality enriched with information about the real and the virtual. Among its limitations is the lack of research. Limitation that stands out when it is tried to analyze the possibilities that it offers to the education when the students become producers of objects of learning in RA. The research is carried out to analyze the following general objective: to know the educational possibilities of the RA as a tool for the production of training experiences by university students. And for this an experience is carried out where the students, after receiving a training action, they must produce objects in RA about the contents of the subject. The degree of acceptance that technology arouses, the degree of motivation, its impact on academic performance, the evaluation of the structure of the training action and the production software used is analyzed. The results confirm the validity of the experience and open lines of future research developments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S. y Kinshuk (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133-149.

Barba, R., Yasaka, S. y Manosalvas, C. (2015). Impacto de la realidad aumentada móvil en el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje de estudiantes universitarios del área de medicina. En AIDIPE (vol. 3, pp. 1.421-1.429). Cádiz: Bubok Publishing, SL.

Bicen, H. y Bal, E. (2016). Determination of student opinions in augmented reality. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 8(3), 205-209.

Cabero, J. y Márquez, D. (Dirs.) (2001). Sierra Sur: una experiencia universitaria innovadora para el diseño y desarrollo de material multimedia. Bordón, 53(2), 185-200.

Cabero, J. y Barroso, J. (2016). The educational possibilities of augmented reality. NAER. New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(1), 44-50.

Cabero, J. y García, F. (Coords.) (2016). Realidad aumentada. Madrid: Síntesis.

Cabero, J., Fernández, B. y Marín, V. (2017). Dispositivos móviles y realidad aumentada en el aprendizaje del alumnado universitario. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 20(2), 167-185.

Cabero, J., Horra, I. de la y Sánchez, J. (2018). La realidad aumentada como herrmamienta educativa. Aplicación a la educación infantil, primaria, secundaria y bachillerato. Madrid: Paraninfo.

Cheng, K.-H. (2017). Reading an augmented reality book: an exploration of learners’ cognitive load, motivation, and attitudes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 53-69.

Cheng, Y. y Yeh, H. (2009). From concepts of motivation to its application in instructional design: reconsidering motivation from an instructional design perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 597-605.

Cheng, Y.-M., Lou, S.-J., Kuo, S.-H. y Shih, R.-C. (2013). Investigating elementary school students' technology acceptance by applying digital game-based learning to environmental education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 96-110.

Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. y Sutton, I. L. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 67-100.

Cózar, R., Moya, M.ª del V. de, Hernández, J. A. y Hernández, J. R. (2015). Tecnologías emergentes para la enseñanza de las ciencias sociales. Una experiencia con el uso de realidad aumentada en la formación inicial de maestros. Digital Education Review, 27, 138-153.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.

Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340

Espósito, T., Muñoz-Castro, F. J., Herrera-Usagre, M. y Periáñez-Vega, M. (2015). Fiabilidad y validez para un cuestionario de satisfacción con la formación continuada en salud: el cuestionario de satisfacción del discente. Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica, 18(3), 197-203.

Hernández, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.

Ho, L-H., Hung, C.-L. y Chen, H.-C. (2013). Using theoretical models to examine the acceptance behavior of mobile phone messaging to enhance parent-teacher interaction. Computers & Education, 61, 105-114.

Jamali, S., Shiratuddin, M. F., Wong, K. W. y Oskam, C. L. (2015). Utilising mobile-augmented reality for learning human anatomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 659-668.

Jeřábek, T., Rambousek, V. y Wildová, R. (2014). Specifics of visual perception of the augmented reality in the context of education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 598-604.

Johnson, L. y Adams, J. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance. New York: Springer.

Kim, K., Hwang, J., Zo, H. y Lee, H. (2016). Understanding users’ continuance intention toward smartphone augmented reality applications. Information Development, 32(2), 161-174.

López-Bonilla, L. M. y López-Bonilla, J. M. (2011). Los modelos de adopción de tecnologías de la información desde el paradigma actitudinal. Cuadernos EBAPE. BR, 9(1), 177-197.

Lorenzo, C., Alarcón de Amo, M.ª del C. y Gómez, M. Á. (2011). Adopción de redes sociales virtuales: ampliación del modelo de aceptación tecnológica integrando confianza y riesgo percibido. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 14, 194-205.

Lu, S. y Ying-Chieh, L. (2014). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525-541.

Martínez, S. y Fernández, B. (2018). Objetos de realidad aumentada: percepciones del alumno de pedagogía. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 53, 207-220.

McKernan, J. (2001). Investigación-acción y currículum. Madrid: Morata.

Nielsen, B., Brandt, H. y Swensen, H. (2017). Augmented reality in science education-affordances for student learning. NorDina, 12(2), 157-174.

O'Dwyer, L. y Bernauer, J. (2014). Quantitative research for the qualitative researcher. California: Sage.

Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1-11.

Santos, M. E. C., Lübke, A. in W., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Rodrigo, M.ª M. T., Sandor, C. y Kato, H. (2016). Augmented reality as multimedia: the case for situated vocabulary learning. Research and Practice in Techology Enhanced Learning, 11(4), 1- 23.

Tarhini, A., Hone, K. y Liu, X. (2014). Measuring the moderating effect of gender and age on e-learning acceptance in England: a structural equation modeling approach for an extended technology acceptance model. Journal Educational Computing Research, 51(2), 163-184.

Villalustre, L. y Moral, M. E. del (Coords.) (2016). Experiencias interactivas con realidad aumentada en las aulas. Barcelona: Octaedro.

Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y. y Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers & Education, 81, 221-234.