M-learning in the field Production Direction through flipped classroom with virtual collaborative environments and its evaluation with rubrics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2017.156Keywords:
m-learning, flipped classroom, virtual collaborative environments, rubricsAbstract
This study is part of a teacher change and improvement project whose aim is to modify the traditional teaching system in the field of Production Management (Operations Management), focusing its learning on the acquisition of the competences required by the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), in such a way that the student participates actively and is involved in the solution of the problems of real companies raised in the classroom in a virtual collaborative environment, supported in social networks through the use of different mobile devices (m-learning).
Innovative methodologies such as flipped classroom, where we propose that the student begins to play an active role through problem-based collaborative learning (PBCL), whose purpose will be to train students capable of analyzing and facing problems in the same way as they would during their professional activity. However, for this methodological change to be successful, it will have to be accompanied by well-designed rubrics that allow the correct evaluation of group work and participation in the classroom. In this way, the students will know the competences achieved and those that need strengthening.
Downloads
References
Alfalla-Luque, R.; Medina-López, C. y Arenas-Márquez, F. J. [2011]: «Mejorando la formación en dirección de operaciones: la visión del estudiante y su respuesta ante diferentes metodologías docentes», Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 14 (2), págs. 40-52.
ANECA [2011]: Guía de apoyo para la elaboración de la memoria de verificación de títulos oficiales universitarios (grado y máster), Madrid: ANECA. (Última actualización 16-01-2012).
Cabero, J. y Marín, V. [2014]: «Posibilidades educativas de las redes sociales y el trabajo en grupo. Percepciones de los alumnos universitarios», Revista Comunicar, 42 (XXI), págs. 165-172.
Cox, J. F. y Walker, E. D. [junio 2005]: «Increasing student interest and comprehension of production planning and control and operations performance measurement concepts using a production line game», Journal of Management Education, 29 (3), págs. 489-511.
Fish, L. [2008]: «Graduate student project: employer operations management analysis», Journal of Education for Business, 84 (1), págs. 18-30.
Hung, S.-H. y Cheng, M. J. [2013]: «Are you ready for knowledge sharing? An empirical study of virtual communities», Computers & Education, 62, págs. 8-17.
Lobato, C.; Apodaca, P. M.; Barandiaran, M. C.; San José, M.ª J.; Sancho, J. y Zubimendi, J. L. [2010]: «Development of the competences of teamwork through cooperative learning at the university», International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education, 3 (3), págs. 224-240.
López-Pastor, V. M.; Pintor, P.; Muros, B. y Webb, G. [2013]: «Formative assessment strategies and their effect on student performance and on student and tutor workload: the results of research projects undertaken in preparation for greater convergence of universities in Spain within the European Higher Education Area (EHEA)», Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37 (2), págs. 163-180.
Malini, R. Y. y Andrade, H. [2010]: «A review of rubric use in higher education», Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (4), págs. 435-448.
MEC [2006]: Propuestas para la renovación de las metodologías educativas en la universidad, Comisión para la Renovación de las Metodologías Educativas en la Universidad, Subdirección General de Información y Publicaciones.
Medina, C.; Alfalla, R. y Marín, J. A. [2011]: «La Investigación en docencia en Dirección de Operaciones: tendencias y retos», Intangible Capital, 7 (2), págs. 507-548.
Oltra, M.ª J.; García, C.; Flor, M.ª L. y Boronat, M. [2013]: «Aprendizaje activo y desempeño del estudiante: diseño de un curso de Dirección de la Producción», Working Papers on Operations Management, 3 (2), págs. 84-102.
Palacios, A. y López, V. M. [2013]: «Haz lo que yo digo, pero no lo que yo hago: sistemas de evaluación del alumnado en la formación inicial del profesorado», Revista de Educación, 361, págs. 279-305.
Piercy, N. [2010]: «Experiential learning: the case of the production game», Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8 (1), págs. 275-280.
Pons, R. M.ª; Serrano, J. M.; Lomeli, C.; Alcántar, V. M.; Arroyo, D.; Serrano, E.; Ceballos, S.; Quinonez, R. y Olivos, T. [2010]: «Cooperative learning: a methodological answer to instructional design based on competences in the university environment», International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education, 3 (3), págs. 202-223.
Roberts, T. S. [2005]: «Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: an introduction», en T. S. Roberts (ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education, Hershey: Idean Group Publishing, págs. 1-18.
Salmerón, H.; Rodríguez, S. y Gutiérrez, C. [ 2010]: «Metodologías que optimizan la comunicación en entornos de aprendizaje virtuales», Comunicar, 34, págs. 163-171.
Schank, R. [2013]: Enseñando a pensar, Barcelona: Ediciones Erasmus.
Talbert, R. [2012]: «Inverted classroom», Colleagues, 9 (1), article 7.
Villalustre, L.; Moral Pérez, M.ª E. del [ 2010]:«E-portafolios y rúbricas de evaluación en Ruralnet», Pixel-Bit: Revista de Medios y Educación, 37, págs. 93-105.
Yazici, H. J. [2006]: «Simulation modeling of a facility layout in operations management classes», Simulation and Gaming, 37, págs. 73-87.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Sonia Martín-Gómez, Cristina Masa-Lorenzo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.